Watch out for lease-to-own mismatches between Afternic and Atom

Buyers might be more inclined to purchase a domain at the marketplace offering lower monthly payments.

Picture of one hundred dollar bills with the words "lease to own"

Elliot Silver posted today about how he handles “dual” listings that are on both Atom (premium) and Afternic.

I sold a domain on Afternic last month that was also listed on Atom, and it brings up another thing to keep a close eye on: lease-to-own settings.

In this case, the domain was normally priced at $11,999 on Atom. The domain was set to the default LTO terms. This sets durations for domains according to the price:

  • Domains Priced Between $500 – $2K: 6 Months (Recommended)
  • Domains Priced Between $2K and $10K: 12 Months (Recommended)
  • Domains Priced Between $10K and $25K: 24 Months (Recommended)

I also authorize Atom to apply discounts to domains. When the domain was sold on Afternic, Atom had applied a discount that dropped the price below $10k. This reduced the LTO duration from 24 months to 12 months.

The buyer chose the 24-month option at Afternic. So even though the price was higher on Afternic, the buyer had a monthly option there that was actually lower.

This is clearly an edge case — the temporary price reduction changed the LTO length.

However, I hadn’t really thought about LTO length differences between Afternic and Atom. I reviewed my portfolio today and found that many of the domains that have 12-month options at Atom were set to 24 at Afternic. I adjusted them accordingly.

I often change the terms (be they pricing or LTO length) at Afternic on a bulk basis. When doing this, I should also check how they are listed on Atom.

Source: https://domainnamewire.com/